Thursday, November 6, 2014

Blog Post #14 Hamlet and Movie Connection (Horatio)

Why, I am very outraged about the dire situations in which Hamlet is obviously dealing with. Why, on top of this insanity, I have watched a moving picture called Memento. The lad, Leonard  Shelby, carried drawings within his body; his situation simply resembled that of my dear friend Hamlet. The lad within the film and Hamlet would make tremendous acquaintances all due to their revenge drama within their lives. Both avenge the dead soul. Leonard avenges his dead lover, while Hamlet avenges his father. The very person that they avenge carry dark implications. The villains within the respective drama’s believe that the “business is well ended,” (2.1.85). However, they fail to notice the other half of the story which is revenge. Both, Hamlet and Leonard are confused psychologically, but they are clear in their motives for revenge. They both must continually ask questions and be suspicious of those around them. Hamlet must be careful of Rosencratz and Guildenstern, as I am the most loyal of friends. Both, Leonard and Hamlet are very lost in thought; however, they must continue to question the espionage taking place within their surroundings. Some people such as the ambassador might define the conditions of Hamlet and Leonard as “to define true madness, What is’t but to be nothing else but mad?” (2.1.93-94). But I believe that madness gives strength to my friend Hamlet as well as Leonard. To Hamlet “Denmark is a prision,” (2.2.223), while to Leonard his intellectual perception is simply a prison. They must escape.


Leonard’s companion has once said “trust yourself, trust your own judgment,” (Memento).  It has come time for Hamlet to trust his judgments of the dangerous souls around him. Hamlet has made the decision to believe in the existence of the ghost as “a dream itself is but a shadow,” (2.2.244) Even if me, Marcelleus and Hamlet were dreaming about the ghost, it is simply our intuition stating the truth. However, we can prove the validity of our intuition during the staged play that Hamlet has set for Claudius to observe. Moral corruption has its ways of seeping through the heart. Why, corruption can be seen within the very eye of Claudius. His idea of using Rosencratz and Guildenstern are very noble examples of him using espionage against my dear friend Hamlet. “Fare you well, my lord,” (2.2.210). Lord Hamlet jr. please keep your judgments intact like Leonard, as they will be the greatest assets within your revenge. With that I must finish typing my blog post in front of this ghostly machine.    

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Blog Post #13 Act I (Horatio)

I am much oppressed to see that my dear friend Hamlet is in the center of ideologies full of corruption. Why he cannot single handedly take matters into his own hands, but how should I help him. Hamlet has simply gone outraged as I overheard his rumblings within his hall. I only have “a piece of him,” (1.1.19), but I must search for others as he has lost them all after his father’s death. To make matters worse, King Hamlet senior has told his son to vow revenge against the very corrupt Claudius. Why, before me and Marcellus could reach Hamlet, the ghost of King Hamlet senior “vanish’d from our sight,” (1.2.119). If I observed this ghost, I would call for it to bring an army in order to fight the corrupt souls within the walls of Denmark. Why should Hamlet feel the burden, himself?  Hamlet’s anger after hearing his father shows his haste with revenge against Claudius. “While one with moderate haste might tell a hundred,” (1.2.236). I must stop Hamlet’s urgency to vow revenge against the corrupt, as it will bring very grave dangers beyond his powers.


Furthermore, in this blog post, I must convey the corrupt state of affairs within the happenings of Denmark. Claudius is simply a corrupt individual driven by lust for the queen and greed for the throne. Claudius contains “some vicious mole of nature,” (1.4.24). Since nature has chosen his origin he cannot be saved from the treacherous hands of corruption or from Hamlet’s bloody revenge. All actions have a price, time has come to which he must now pay. What Claudius believed once dead is now alive revisiting “the glimpses of the moon,” (1.4.53). Claudius, beware! Hamlet Senior has unleashed the fury of his son on you, due to your treacherous act of murder. Why you have done very much than murdering King Hamlet secnior. You have stolen his love which is the queen. Why true love will live over lust, Claudius. Beware! 

Sunday, November 2, 2014

Blog Post #12 (Character Discussion)

Within my blog, I have chosen to focus on the character of Horatio. There are many aspects that I find very interesting within this character. Most of all, his loyalty to Hamlet is what strikes me the most. From research, Horatio is a character that is not willing to continue his life in the case of Hamlets death; this aspect of loyalty brought me a liking towards this character. As a reader of Hamlet, I would like to dwell deeper into how this loyalty to Hamlet came about to Horatio. As of now, several questions are floating in my head of whether this loyalty is part of a conspiracy against the character of Hamlet. If these questions carry true, then I will be able to come about interesting blog posts. Another aspect about Horatio is that he is very knowledgeable; however he does not use this knowledge in creative ways. In my view, I see that this character is not using his full potential. I see as if this character his hidden beneath the huge shadow of Hamlet. This character would be highly useful to write in the social media space, as Horatio is a man of actions than words. I can write about the reasoning’s about Horatio actions through his perspective. This character is seen as merely a side character; however, Horatio carries complexity through his friendship with Hamlet. Through my blog it can be expected that I will be very loyal to Hamlet as well as being safe within the politics involved within the plot. Through this character I wish to track the theme of “action vs. inaction.”

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Blog Post #11 Who's There. Words. Words. Words

“Who’s There?” Words, words, words
Gokul Muru, Rachel Darrah, Tanner Csendes, Adam Manguiat

Thesis: By using direct and informative dialogue, the use of midnight as the setting of the scene, and defensive diction that implies a tense gathering, the first scene of Shakespeare’s Hamlet expresses a suspicious tone when Bernardo asks “Who’s there?”(1.1.1) to suggest that man is an animal of constant vigilance.

Outline:

Thesis: By using direct and informative dialogue, the use of midnight as the setting of the scene, and defensive diction that implies a tense gathering, the first scene of Shakespeare’s Hamlet expresses a suspicious tone when Bernardo asks “Who’s there?”(1.1.1) to suggest that man is an animal of constant vigilance.

  • Informative Dialogue
    • “Nay, answer me: stand, and unfold yourself,” (1.1.2)
      • This is a command for the person to identify themselves so the threat level can be assessed. In addition, the syntax incorporate a semicolon which present a slight pause, therefore implying that Francisco is speaking with caution when confronting the unknown. He is exemplifying a character that is constantly vigilant.
    • “Bernardo has my place. Give you good night,” (1.1.17)
      • This line is basically outlining the change in shifts and the change in temporary power that is taking place after all of the identities and allegiances were revealed.

  • Mid-Night Setting
    • “‘Tis now struck twelve; get thee to bed, Francisco,” (1.1.7)
      • This line directly implies that the words “bed” and “twelve” represent the setting of midnight in a more direct manner. Also, the idea man as a vigilant animal can be present in the form of Francisco as he is awake when everyone is laying in bed.
    • “You come most carefully upon your hour” (1.1.6)
      • The idea of vigilance is directly referenced within the line. The setting of midnight,itself, is characterized as being harmful to the presence of man-kind. This line also implies that Bernardo has approached Francisco's location with stealth and so he remained undetected - a shadow in the night - until he asked “who’s there?”

  • Defensive Diction
    • “Friends to this ground” (1.1.13)
      • The word “Friends” immediately illustrates that in Shakespeare’s world there are both friends and foes in existence. This one word captures the fact that man has a reason to be vigilant as any conspiracy can be laid upon them. Because Horatio identified himself as this instead of stating his name or position, his allegiance was the most important thing that he established to show that there was no danger from him.
    • “The rivals of my watch, bid them make haste,” (1.1.11)
      • “Rivals” and “Haste” are two such words that capture vigilance within a man. “Rivals” shows the meaning of enemies, while “Haste” shows the meaning of urgent action. The incorporation of words in this sentence allows for readers to understand the realm of Shakespeare’s characters who have to keep their eyes open in order to fulfill their duties, this idea can be mainly seen in the scenario of Bernardo with his apprehension towards Horatio and Marcellus.


Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Blog Post #10 Thesis Statement Revision

Prompt: Carefully read the passage from “Dream Child; a Reverie,” paying special attention to descriptive details and sentence structure. Then, write an essay in which you analyze how Charles Lamb’s style contributes to his portrayal of his “dream children,” his grandmother, and his own childhood.

Initial Thesis Statement: Lamb through the story “Dream Children; a Reverie” depicts that grandmother and children as people who the narrator wishes to be someday as he uses powerful imagery to describe character, allusions that relate with the overall character, and diction that create the positive atmosphere in the story.

ARGUMENT/FOCUS   

_No_Does my thesis statement address each part of the essay question?
_No_ Is the point I'm making one that would generate discussion and argument, or is it one
that would leave people asking, “So what?"
_Yes _ Have I focused on an interesting contradiction, tension or paradox between two things?

Example: Although the escalation of violence in John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men eventually results in two deaths, it is through violence that compassion is revealed when George, in a violent but merciful act, saves Lenny from cruel mob justice.

_Yes__ Is my thesis too vague? Too general? Should I focus on some more specific aspect of my
topic?
__Yes_ Does my thesis deal directly with the topic at hand, or is it a declaration of my personal
feelings (“I think”/ “I feel” statements)?

LANGUAGE

_No__ Does my thesis indicate the direction of my argument? Does it suggest a structure for
my paper?
__No_ Is the language in my thesis vivid and clear? Have I structured my sentence so that the
important information is in the main clause? Have I used subordinate clauses to
house less important information? Have I used parallelism to show the relationship
between parts of my thesis? In short, is this thesis the very best sentence that it can be?
                                     No__  Is the thesis statement written as a complex sentence?

Revised Thesis Statement:  With a more humanistic approach, Lamb depicts the “dream children”, his grandmother, and his childhood with both a tone of gracefulness as well as a slight edge of darkness mainly through his use of spiritual description and cumulative syntax; only his use of these devices through this manner has allowed the reader to feel the humanistic complexity within this presented story.  

Revision Process: When observing my initial thesis statement, I find that it carried less argumentative diction, therefore resulting in a weaker statement. Moreover, I stated my main points directly without forming a sense of complexity within the process; the points did not produce any thought within my reader, when they read this thesis, they would ask: So What? To avoid this “So what?” question, I used the onion technique that I learned in the Sophomore year of my high school career. This technique involved writing a thesis statements, but asking “so what?” for each question. I kept questioning my thesis statement until I arrived at an optimal one. This was the revision process I used to write my revised thesis statement.  

Blog Post #9 Scores for Grammar Quizzes

Category
Total Possible
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Finding subjects and verbs in simple sentences
15
12
15

Making subjects and verbs agree
15
15


Correcting the fragment in simple sentences
15
12
15

Combining sentences using the three methods of coordination
15
12
15

Combining sentences using subordination
15
15


Correcting the run on
15
10
11
15
Choosing the correct pronoun form
15
10
15

Choosing the correct verb form
15
9
14
15
Using correct capitalization and punctuation
15
14
15

15
13
15

Choosing the correct form of the irregular verb
15
15


Blog Post #9 Reflection #2

Reflection #2

When observing the scores of my quizzes with the re-testing, I am able to see that I demonstrate mastery of a 100% with all subjects. These subjects range from the sentence structure, itself, to the parts in a sentence, such as subject, verb, and pronoun usage. This result of complete mastery depicts to me that I have the ability to apply these concepts into my future writings.

The most relevant idea that I am able to perceive from this experience is that I have gained the ability to put the sum of the parts (noun, verb, and pronoun usage) into a whole (sentence structure).  However, the most interesting aspect of this experience was the methodology I used to obtain mastery for all subjects in the grammar quizzes; I would look at each part of the sentence in an abstract manner. I would take each building block such as subject-verb agreement and observe if there is any mistake with it. Afterwards, I put the sentence together and would find the correct structure when it came to the fragment, coordination, and run-on exercises. Initially, my first time taking these quizzes, I looked at all aspects as a whole without dissecting each section of the sentence. Now I see the importance in breaking the whole into a sum of parts.

I have learned the importance of how all components of a sentence such as noun, verb, and pronoun can make a complete thought or idea. In addition to the idea of grammar, I have also learned to use the tools such as OWL Purdue more effectively when it came to learning grammar. After this experience, I have set new long-term goals as an English student. I now carry the goal of being an effective proofreader as well as a writer. Ultimately, I learned that writing takes patience to put the skills together.